post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-18878,single-format-standard,elision-core-1.0.9,everest-forms-no-js,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,qode-theme-ver-4.3,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.0.5,vc_responsive
Title Image


Where Are All the Non-Wires Alternatives?

  |   Solar, solar industry

Earlier this month, Washington, D.C.-based Pepco became the latest United States utility to seek out non-wires alternatives (NWAs) to address an upcoming constraint on its network.

In early August, the Exelon subsidiary called on distributed energy developers and other stakeholders to propose alternatives to installing a fifth transformer at one of its substations. The existing transformers are forecasted to exceed their firm capacity by 2026.

Will any of the proposals submitted to Pepco early next year succeed?

Only time will tell, but a new Wood Mackenzie research report finds that on average, NWAs proposed in the United States move forward only 40 percent of the time.

That’s because NWA proposals are still often deemed either more expensive or less reliable than the conventional reinforcement option.

Most NWA opportunities identified do not get implemented

Wood Mackenzie defines NWAs as projects in which utilities use distributed energy resources (DERs) and other technologies to reinforce the grid, instead of relying on conventional transmission and distribution assets.

Regulations in some states are increasingly encouraging utilities to identify NWA opportunities whenever possible, but the decision on whether to pursue them is left to utilities’ cost-benefit analyses.

The pipeline of new NWA opportunities — those looming grid upgrades that could potentially be met through DERs, according to the assessment of the utilities that have identified them — is growing in the U.S.. According to WoodMac data, about 850 megawatts of power capacity in the form of NWA projects have been identified or already implemented across the country. 

However, the current pace of developments remain too slow and scarce to make NWAs a significant business opportunity for DER providers.

Most of these projects are in states where regulators mandate that utilities identify new NWA opportunities as part of their grid planning process, such as New York and California. Indeed, these two states host 72 percent of the 321 projects included in Wood Mackenzie’s US NWA database.

At the same time, as more regulators push more utilities to report on a wider set of potential NWA projects, the number of NWA opportunities being implemented compared to the total identified in the database is shrinking. That’s because an increasing number of identified projects have little to no hope of moving on to solicitation.

This situation has created a double-edged sword for the sector. On one hand, broad disclosure of NWA opportunities provides useful information for interested third parties, such as DER providers and utilities and regulators in other states.

On the other hand, this broad disclosure dilutes the share of NWA projects progressing towards implementation. This situation risks decreasing interest in NWAs from the same third parties, as projects only move forward in 40 percent of cases.

Cost and reliability concerns are the main factors that result in projects not being pursued.

Every NWA project is  unique and presents specific challenges. The strength of relationships between DER providers and utilities is a major factor in whether or not NWA project move forward. So are siting and permitting issues. All of this complicates relying on DERs for grid upgrades, even for those utilities that are openly committed to pursuing NWAs.

Battery storage emerges as preferred NWA resource

Declining DER costs and the development of new value streams for DERs via market design reform will be key enablers of greater penetration of NWAs on the U.S. grid over the coming years.  

For example, Wood Mackenzie expects the implementation of FERC Order 841 to increase the feasibility of NWAs that use battery storage solutions.

The ability to value stack by participating in wholesale markets will likely enable DERs providers to offer utilities a more attractive solution for their NWA projects.

Wood Mackenzie’s recent report finds that of those NWAs that do move forward, front-of-the-meter battery storage is the technology of choice.

Thanks to its greater cost-competitiveness compared to other resources, battery storage accounts for the majority of NWA project capacity currently under implementation in the U.S., and Wood Mackenzie expects FERC Order 841 will strengthen this trend going forward.


Francesco Menonna is a grid edge analyst at Wood Mackenzie and author of the recent report ‘US non-wires alternatives H1 2020: Battery storage seizes top spot as utilities’ preferred non-wires resource.’